BOSTON'S PROMINENT
HAITIAN BUSINESSMAN LEO DESIRE INCARCERATED,
DENIED BAIL; A VERDICT OF CULPABILITY FOR
HAITI'S PRESIDENT MARTELLY LONGTIME CLOSE
FRIEND, OFFICIAL SENIOR ADVISER BY A U.S. COURT
OF LAW
- By Yves A. Isidor,
Wehaitians.com Executive Editor
CAMBRIDGE, MA, Nov. 24 -
You will not have to wonder why so many opinions,
all nearly identical, as usual, will soon be issued about
Mr. Leo Desire (you will soon find a photograph
of him), a longtime Boston's prominent
Haitian businessman (one, who with the help of
Voodoo,
many always assumed, had eluded arrest), who was arrested about two
months ago by authorities of the Commonwealth of Massachusetts
and since has been denied bail by a
court of law, pending a trial, after
a long investigation by The State of Massachusetts
Attorney General Office, The New England Cable
News Television station, to name only these two, over allegations of
grand-scale mortgage fraud.
In the Boston's
Haitian-American community, other Haitian immigrant communities, including the mother land
of Haiti, all are where hearsay, unfortunately,
passes for truth and paranoia for knowledge in issues that concern politics
and economic development, if not, too,
conspiracy theory, to also cite only this one, in
earthquake-nearly
eviscerated Haiti (where
life continues to be more and more involved or
filled with danger,
and fast), the United
States, and elsewhere.
_______________________________ |
The
writer, Yves A. Isidor, a longtime economics
faculty member at the University of
Massachusetts-
Dartmouth, after principally teaching the
subject of
the same name at many Boston area colleges
and universities, always places, too, great
emphasis
on issues related to Economics of Crime and its
Prevention: How Is Too Much in one of his
assigned
courses,
Contemporary Issues
Economics,
alternately, Economics of
Social Issues. Often,
Professor Isidor conveys his thoughts or opinion,
also
to the
U.S. news media, on issues not limited to
the
very sad Republic of Haiti, which certainly does
not need an
army.
_______________________________ |
What's more, regrettably false rumor is not only
the opium or opiate of the "ignorant masses," to borrow
the very few words of Marx, who are incapable of
determining the anticipated consequences of
their ("they are to rule," famously said Plato) irreprehensible actions when they
subsequently cause, at least, reparable
psychological damages, irreparable psychological
trauma, but it trumps even
basic clarity, rudimentary reasoning about a
functioning democratic system (imperfect it may
be), say, that of the U.S., where the arrest of
a person for an alleged wrong or wrongs does not
automatically equate a conviction and ultimately
punishment - that is incarceration in a
city/county jail or state/federal penitentiary
(if any), depending on the gravity of the crime
or crimes proven committed by the offender, for a short or
long duration of time.
Haiti's archaic educational system, of course,
so deficient ("So goes Haiti's educational
system, so goes the Caribbean nation," longtime
educator and activist, Josue Merilien recently
eloquently told Le Nouvelliste d'Haiti, a highly
respected daily newspaper); the famously dirt-poor nation's
perennial illiteracy (poverty also denies them
the pleasure of reading) rate, high, in absolute terms, are
two of the indisputable reasons Haitians, on the
average, sadly continue to surrender to "bourik
congoism" or extreme stupidity, pronounced unwanted
ignorance.
What is also, undoubtedly, consequential about
that, and for a longtime so, is that, blanket
abject poverty, the principal cause of the small
Caribbean corner's
cholera
epidemic, to cite only
this major threat to political stability to
urgently needed economic development, will
indefinitely continue to be one of the principal
determinants of nearly all of the historically
troubled small land's estimated 9.2 million citizens quality of life.
The poor men and women in the Boston's diaspora community, if they are to think for
themselves, cease to be taken for
comedians by a
Graham Greene-like, since the internationally
renown British author deceased long ago, or simply a bunch of risible
people, must know that Boston's Leo Desire (he
is not of nature public speakers, nor does he
speaks in a mumble),
a criminal defendant like many before and after him, again who about two
months ago was taken out of the circulation, has
since been denied bail (in such case, the
presumption of innocence is largely theoretical), permitting him to
temporarily or permanently regain his liberty
(depending on the outcome of the case), over
allegations of grand-mortgage fraud, is presumed
to be innocent until otherwise, that is a
verdict of culpability is returned against him
by a court of law after a bench or trial by
jury - the presumption of innocence, an ancient
tenet of criminal law actually, a misnomer.
According to the U.S. Supreme Court, the
presumption of innocence of a criminal defendant
is best described as an assumption of innocence
that is indulged in the absence of contrary
evidence.
Why only a conviction
for a white-collar crime or a few of them associated with
grand-scale mortgage fraud, in the aftermath of
which the term of imprisonment is at least 1
year, matters a lot more for Mr. Desire, his immediate
family members and others concerned about what
the future holds for him when compared to other
persons (U.S. citizens, by birth or
naturalization) who have also been convicted of
different, but a lot worse aggravated felonies, such
as arson that results in the death of many
lives, if not, too, offsprings made urchins or
orphans, in most cases, both, and because of so
they each receive a gargantuan sentence?
|
U.S.
Immigration and
Customs
Enforcement
police (ICE),
after placing an
immigrant under
arrest.
Photo may be
copyrighted.
|
The perils of
being a lawful
permanent
resident in the
U.S. and violate
its rules of
conduct or
procedure |
|
Yet, Mr. Desire remains a Haitian citizen by
birth, decades after he was first admitted to
the U.S. as a permanent resident. After serving
a prolonged prison sentence, or even before the
completion of so, as is commonplace today (a
continuum, since the 1996 new immigration law) he will be
compelled
by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) to leave the nation for the rest of his
natural life, through a procedure known as
"removal" or "deportation" - even if the harsh
penalty imposed by the sentencing judge were to
rather be served also or only on probation. In
this particular case, it (probation, sure
supervised) differs in scale the act of suspending the
sentence of a person convicted of a criminal
offense and granting that person provisional
liberty on the promise of good behavior. As they
say in the vernacular, you are in prison without
being (physically) in prison - by way of
alternation, a non-custodial
sentence.
_________________
|
|
"The
past is not
dead. In fact,
it's not even
the past,"
William
Faulkner. |
_________________
|
On Boston's Ronald "Roro"
Nelson A longtime close friend of Haiti's
President Michel Joseph Martelly, now also one
of his official senior national advisers on
matters that concern security, he was recently
(Nov. 23) convicted on two counts of assault and battery
with a deadly weapon (a violent physical attack
that is not limited to a sharp blow made with
the open hand, ripping the victim's synthetic
hair from her scalp, tearing apart the skirt of
the female person who is already harmed and
piercing, at least, one of her cheeks, with the
help of automobile keys), by a Commonwealth of
Massachusetts (Dorchester District Court)
tribunal, after a jury of 12 men and women
deliberated only for hours and 7 subsequently
voted in favor and, following a trial presided
by Judge David Poole (he had to restore order in
his chamber, after the defendant's plethora of
supporters became very upset at the
non-anticipated verdict, as their ululated cries
of disapproval or condemnation of it suggested), who long before the
unpleasant verdict ordered the defendant to
surrender his passport.
From the Court of Law, a Summons to Ronald Nelson
|
USA vs. Ronald
Nelson
Trial Court of
Massachusetts
510 Washington
Street
Dorchester, MA
02124
Date: 11/10/2011
Start: 11:07 AM
Jury Trial
Section 13A. (a)
Whoever commits
an assault or an
assault and
battery upon
another shall be
punished by
imprisonment for
not more than 2
1/2 years in a
house of
correction or by
a fine of not
more than
$1,000.
A summons may be
issued instead
of a warrant for
the arrest of
any person upon
a complaint for
a violation of
any provision of
this subsection
if in the
judgment of the
court or justice
receiving the
complaint there
is reason to
believe that he
will appear upon
a summons.
(b) Whoever
commits an
assault or an
assault and
battery:
(i) upon another
and by such
assault and
battery causes
serious bodily
injury;
(ii) upon
another who is
pregnant at the
time of such
assault and
battery, knowing
or having reason
to know that the
person is
pregnant; or
(iii) upon
another who he
knows has an
outstanding
temporary or
permanent
vacate,
restraining or
no contact order
or judgment
issued pursuant
to section 18,
section 34B or
34C of chapter
208, section 32
of chapter 209,
section 3, 4 or
5 of chapter
209A, or section
15 or 20 of
chapter 209C, in
effect against
him at the time
of such assault
or assault and
battery; shall
be punished by
imprisonment in
the state prison
for not more
than 5 years or
in the house of
correction for
not more than 2
1/2 years, or by
a fine of not
more than
$5,000, or by
both such fine
and
imprisonment.
|
More, the sad news conveyed to Mr. Nelson by a
jury of his peers came months
after Haitian feminist groups, others said to be
principally envious (being characterized by envy
is nothing new in the destructive Haitian
culture) of his new found wealth (his
friend Martelly, in good times and bad times, is now president)
incessantly pressured the alleged victim, Ms.
Astride Pantal Walsh, 45, a
former girlfriend, the party against which the
criminal action was brought owed about
$3,000.00, and like a debt collector, was
aggressively trying to recover, to press charges against him.
|
Is it the end of
Mr. Nelson's
Calvary or
Golgotha-like? |
|
By way of conclusion, was the punishment established by law or
authority for Mr. Nelson's crime or offense at least 1
year in a state penitentiary other than 1 year
of probation, the first four months of so, a
period during which he must report with
regularity to his probation officer, sure the regrettable
fate reserved for the very affable man - a
person other than being
perceived laughingly as a playboy by some people, especially when
a reduced number of them are consuming alcoholic beverages
distilled at a high proof; one, who likes U.S.
television comedian Jay Leno or David Letterman
(the latter, too, receives a longterm
exceptional remuneration package, not Mr.
Nelson),
finds great pleasure in telling jokes on the radio
and during his Haitian television appearances - after the completion of his
prison term he would physically be forced
(after being placed in handcuffs and shackles)
to permanently depart the U.S. for his native
Haiti, where he is still a citizen - a near
certainty. See
a short summary of the 1996 U.S. new immigration
law signed by then President William Jefferson
"Bill" Clinton that is current as of today.
|